-
Study: Marijuana Does Not Lead to Hard Drugs
Study: Marijuana Does Not Lead to Hard Drugs
Mon Dec 2, 4:54 PM ETWASHINGTON (Reuters) – Countering a basic principle of American
anti-drug policies, an independent U.S. study concluded on Monday that
marijuana use does not lead teenagers to experiment with hard drugs like
heroin or cocaine.The study by the private, nonprofit RAND Drug Policy Research Center
rebutted the theory that marijuana acts as a so-called gateway drug to
more harmful narcotics, a key argument against legalizing pot in the
United States.The researchers did not advocate easing restrictions in marijuana, but
questioned the focus on this substance in drug control efforts.Using data from the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse between 1982
and 1994, the study concluded teenagers who took hard drugs were
predisposed to do so whether they tried marijuana first or not.“Kids get their first opportunity to use marijuana years before they get
their first exposure to hard drugs,” said Andrew Morral, lead author of
the RAND study.“Marijuana is not a gateway drug. It’s just the first thing kids often
come across.”Morral said 50 percent of U.S. teenagers had access to marijuana by the
age of 16, while the majority had no exposure to cocaine, heroin or
hallucinogens until they were 20.The study, published in the British journal Addiction, does not advocate
legalizing or decriminalizing marijuana, which has been linked to
side-effects including short-term memory loss.But given limited resources, Morral said the U.S. government should
reconsider the prominence of marijuana in its much-publicized “war on
drugs.”“To a certain extent we are diverting resources away from hard drug
problems,” he said. “Spending money on marijuana control may not be
having downstream consequences on the use of hard drugs.”Researchers say predisposition to drug use has been linked to genetic
factors and one’s environment, including family dynamics and the
availability of drugs in the neighborhood.Ska bli intressant att läsa sen när den blir tillgänglig.. 😉
-
3 Replies
-
Har du länken? Eller du kanske inte tog den från nätet?
-
Med erfarenheter ifrån den indragna WHO-rapporten så kan vi nog räkna med att rapporten kommer att ogiltigförklaras på ett eller annat sätt.
Skulle tippa på att dom kommer att peka på urvalet bland dom som ingåt i testet inte tillräckligt representerar befolkningen i stort och därför kan man inte lita på resultatet…Det finns alltför starka ekonomiska intressen i USA som vill att plantan ska utrotas helt. Framförallt oljeindustrin.
Det är inte mycket som har förändrats sedan -30-talet. -
@Charles-Gunnar wrote:
Har du länken? Eller du kanske inte tog den från nätet?
N, jag fick artikeln som mail… men den kunde väl eventuellt finnas på Reuters website..? Själva rapporten finns inte tillgänglig än vad jag känner till, men ..tja. 🙄 😉
