- Posted by Paddington on 2002-10-01 at 22:39
När det gäller synen på cannabis känns det som om Sverige utan överdrift ligger åtminstone 25 år efter. Klimatet i cannabisfrågan här måste allvarligt talat sakna motstycke i västvärlden? En total hjärntvätt, något att skriva psykologiavhandlingar om.
Känns som om svenskar köper allt de får höra av staten.
70%, vad är det här? 4.7? för en avkrim, medicinsk marijuana vet väl inte svenskar om att det existerar ens. Knark juh.Inget sakligt inlägg detta, tack för infon herodes.
replied 22 years, 2 months ago 4 Members · 10 Replies - 10 Replies
USA en demokrati som alla andra väst-länder *host* *host*.
Hur kan Cannabis vara förbjudet i de länder där en majoritet vill ha det legalt? Är det bara Holland som står emot trycket från FN?
60% 😯 😯
som någon tidigare sa, om USA avkriminaliserar så lär
ju flera länder ta efter ganska så snabbt (förhoppningsvis).shiet vilka siffror egentligen.
Det som är viktigt är att FN tar bort cannabis från listan över kontrollerade preparat. Det var ju USA som en gång “petade in” cannabis där och om de avkriminaliserar så tror jag att det snart kommer att seriöst debatteras i FN. Om cannabis försvinner som “knark” inom FN då handlar det bara om månader eller max några år innan det är legalt i hela världen.
USA kommer säkerligen inte avkriminalisera drogen cannabis, iaf närmaste 50-100 åren… Folket har inte mycket att säga till i dessa frågor… TYVÄRR!!! AHH!
Magnvs….säg inte det.
Säga vad man vill om jänkarna men de är rätt duktiga på att organisera sig själva. De har kraftiga organisationer som är ganska stora, tänker då på NORML m.fl.U.S. WARNS AGAINST LIBERALIZING LAWS ON POT
by Campbell Clark,
Canada
OTTAWA — A move toward possibly decriminalizing marijuana brought warnings yesterday from U.S. officials and lawmakers, who cautioned that Canada should not succumb to “myths” and warned of new disruptions to border trade.
The Bush administration’s drug czar, John Walters, said decriminalization would be a mistake based on misinformation. “I hope the Canadian government does not head down the risky path of decriminalization or legalization,” he said in a statement sent to The Globe and Mail.
While Mr. Walters said that he respects Canada’s right to set its own policy, the chairman of a congressional drug-policy committee said he believes decriminalization would prompt U.S. lawmakers to tighten border controls, disrupting Canada-U.S. trade.
Representative Mark Souder said decriminalization would make Canada a centre of supply and traffic of marijuana that would likely cause Congress and the Bush administration to take tougher measures to police the border.
“Obviously Canada can do whatever it wants with its laws,” Mr. Souder, chairman of the House of Representatives subcommittee on criminal justice, drug policy and human resources, said in an interview with The Globe and Mail. “But to the degree there’s less harmonization with our laws, it means that the border traffic is going to slow down.
“If there’s a higher risk of illegal drugs moving, because decriminalization functions as de facto legalization . . . we’re not going to sit idly by and not check.”
The prospect of riling the United States, which maintains a strict policy at the federal level against marijuana, is one of the concerns that has held the government back from an outright promise to decriminalize the drug.
But in Monday’s Speech from the Throne, the government signalled it is moving toward liberalizing marijuana laws by including the “possibility” of decriminalization in its blueprint of priorities.
Decriminalization would end jail terms, heavy fines and criminal records for simple possession of marijuana, replacing them with a minor sanction similar to a traffic ticket. That would stop short of full legalization, which would allow the open, commercial sale of pot.
Mr. Walters, President George W. Bush’s director of national drug control policy, argued that moves toward liberalizing pot laws have been fuelled by misinformation that suggests marijuana use is not a danger.
“We recognize Canada’s sovereignty, but caution the Canadian people not to fall for the same myths about marijuana that far too many Americans have fallen for,” he said in the statement.
“We have learned through hard experience that marijuana is a dangerous drug with serious public health and social consequences, and I hope the Canadian government does not head down the risky path of decriminalization or legalization.”
The political momentum for relaxing pot laws is growing in Canada, however. The Canadian Medical Association has estimated that 1.5 million Canadians regularly smoke pot, and polls show that almost half of Canadians favour legalization while more — some surveys say seven in 10 — want decriminalization.
Last month, a Senate committee called for full legalization, citing several studies in rejecting arguments that marijuana is addictive, extremely harmful or leads to stronger drugs.
Mr. Souder, an Indiana Republican Indiana, acknowledged that the same debate over pot laws is brewing in his country.
But he predicted that those in the administration and Congress who would favour tightening border controls in response to decriminalization in Canada would win out. …………………..
vi får drömma vidare
källan http://www.norml.org
I USA faller det fler röster på legalisering för privat hemmabruk av Cannabis än vad det föll på Clinton för fyra år sedan…
När blir det än omröstning om legalisering där? Hur mycket makt har egentligen den vanlige amerikanen om detta?
allt som behövs är en sansad och resonlig person som säger avkriminalisering av cannabis, så kommer han vinna.
det tror jag starkt på… varför inte en nästa Ghandi lkr. nått…“We recognize Canada’s sovereignty, but caution the Canadian people not to fall for the same myths about marijuana that far too many Americans have fallen for,” he said in the statement.
Vad menar han? Att han inte vill att the Kanadenskska folket ska falla for
myter? Vilka myter? Myterna om att cannabisrokandefargade blir galna
och valdtar vita kvinnor? Jisses….Sphincter
Log in to reply.